The U.S. Signed Agreements To Teach Immigrants Unionization Rights

Document created by 1002043 on Apr 23, 2015Last modified by 1002028 on May 10, 2015
Version 1Show Document
  • View in full screen mode

Recent News Articles

 

From the CEO's Desk: Good Managers pay attention to behavior and attitude

 

Someone retiring? How to Capture Their Knowledge

 

Sometimes I feel like I am selling fear...

 

You Might As Well Laugh About It

 

The U.S. Signed Agreements To Teach Immigrants Unionization Rights

 

When Can an Employee Resignation Result in Unemployment?

 

From the CEO's Desk: Why managers shouldn’t avoid tough conversations

 

Are you keeping pace with the market for STEM Job Compensation?

 

No Cost / Low Cost Summer Benefits to Keep Employees Engaged

 

How to Handle Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation for Undocumented Workers

 

ALERT: OFCCP Directive on Sexual Orientation / Gender Identity effective April 16, 2015!

 

When Are You Required to Pay Interns?

 

Top 5 Reasons Your Employees Tell Us They are Unhappy

 

CAI Welcomes Jamie Roberts to Lead myCAI

 

EEOC Releases Proposed Regulations on ADA-Compliant Wellness Programs

 

Report Shows “The Changing Face of U.S. Jobs” from 2001-2014

 

Pre-Employment Assesments Raise the Talent Bar & Reduce Hiring Risks

george pic for news.jpgThe U.S. federal government has signed agreements with Mexico, Ecuador and the Philippines to educate immigrants--legal or illegal--about their rights under the National Labor Relations Act to organize, form or to join a union.  Lafe Solomon, former NLRB acting general counsel, signed a "memorandum of understanding" with Mexico's U.S. Ambassador and the current general counsel, Richard Griffin, signed agreements with ambassadors from Ecuador and the Philippines in 2014.  Griffin also testified before Congress in March, 2015 that a major purpose of these "memorandums of understanding" with these three countries is "...to strengthen collaborative efforts to provide foreign business owners doing business in the United States, as well as workers from those countries, with education, guidance and access to information regarding their rights and responsibilities under our statute".

 

The NRLB has stated that the National Labor Relation Act's (NLRA) protections extend to individuals not legally authorized to work in the U.S.  As a result an employer who terminates an illegal immigrant (once it is discovered that the employee is not authorized to work in the U.S.) in accordance with federal immigration law can be sanctioned by the NLRB if it determines that the real reason behind the termination was due to the employee's union activity.

 

Unionization in this country is extremely low with only 11.1% of U.S. employees belonging to a labor union.  Only 6.6% of private sector employees are unionized (35.7% in the public sector).  North Carolina remains the lowest unionized state in the U.S. with only 1.9% (figures released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 23, 2015).  It appears that the NLRB's objective is to do all it can to assist organized labor in their efforts to gain momentum, increasing union membership in the U.S.  The new "Ambush Rule", the "Micro-Unit" Rule, the new ruling on allowing employees to use company emails for union organizing efforts, other Board decisions and now these recently discovered agreements with foreign countries are transparent attempts to achieve the Board's objective.

 

Call me for help in assessing your potential unionization risks and strategies to reduce those risks.  You can reach me at (919) 713-5267 or George.ports@capital.org.

 

Other reading:

 

NLRB "Ambush Rule" Now In Effect

First Union Election at Amazon in US - "Micro-Unit Issue"

Attachments

    Outcomes